Go Back   Official Bulletin Board of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers > Team Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2005, 12:54 PM
shalnmunk's Avatar
shalnmunk shalnmunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
My Mock Draft

Here is how i think it will go.



1 . SAN FRANCISCO- Ronnie Brown RB Auburn

Its Clear that San Fran was 3 rd to last In Rushing last year. Compared to there balance in passing and receiving. I see them taking Brown with the First Pick. Tim is still young.

2. MIAMI- Cedric Benson RB Texas

Second to last in rushing last year still hurt by the whole Ricky Williams effect. I am pretty strong about this one they will take 1,000 yard man from texas.

3. CLEVELAND- Alex Smith QB UTAH

This is probably the hardest one to predict because they could use a WR but they are trying to build and I do not see any other way but with a QB of the future athletic and mobile. Dilfer is not there future.

4. Chicago- Arron Rodgers QB Cal

Dead Last in Passing no question about it they will Draft a QB.

5. Tampa Bay- Mike William WR USC.

To big of a target for them not to pick him. The Bucs will run the clock all the way down on this pick. Until I see Edwards work out I will not say anything but it will be one of the 2 Big WR. But I also seeing the Bucs giving this pick away in a trade and latter on picking up Alex Barron OT FLORIDA STATE. But Gruden will probably take one of the WR. All I know except Cleveland’s pick to be the shifter in this draft.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2005, 12:59 PM
DunnDeal's Avatar
DunnDeal DunnDeal is offline
Eru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bradley, WV
Umm... Tim Rattay has had four years to learn the system in san fran. If he's still garbage now, he ain't their future.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2005, 12:59 PM
BucShag
Guest
 
The Bears are going to take a QB?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2005, 12:59 PM
BucMonkey03's Avatar
BucMonkey03 BucMonkey03 is offline
NFL Draft Expert
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indianapolis,IN
You expect the bears to give up so quickly on Grossman? I think that qb would be the last thing the bears would select. JMO though, everyone is entitled to their own.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:01 PM
eNgLiShBuC
Guest
 
Do you know who Kevan Barlow is? And do you understand that, when you have no passing attack, the D stacks the box against the run?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:01 PM
cammBuc
Guest
 
I have to disagree with you on the Chicago pick. They were dead last in passing last year because they had no wide receivers to speak of and their starting quaterback Rex Grossman was injured all year. Remember he was a 1st round draft choice 2 years ago. I do not see them using another 1st rounder on another quaterback. Just my opinion. I personally think they will go wide receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:02 PM
shalnmunk's Avatar
shalnmunk shalnmunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by BucMonkey03
You expect the bears to give up so quickly on Grossman? I think that qb would be the last thing the bears would select. JMO though, everyone is entitled to their own.
Well you know your right .. But maybe drafting a Qb will provide a drew brees Effect....... lol... San diego Drafted Rivers and made brees a pro bowler
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:03 PM
shalnmunk's Avatar
shalnmunk shalnmunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by cammBuc
I have to disagree with you on the Chicago pick. They were dead last in passing last year because they had no wide receivers to speak of and their starting quaterback Rex Grossman was injured all year. Remember he was a 1st round draft choice 2 years ago. I do not see them using another 1st rounder on another quaterback. Just my opinion. I personally think they will go wide receiver.
Yes i know who he is . but they were so terrible last year its not even funny.....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:04 PM
c-money's Avatar
c-money c-money is offline
MDB
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Bears are not going to take a QB. Cleveland will take the QB San Fran doesn't select or Derrick Johnson. Miami will take a RB, either Brown or Benson.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:07 PM
ThanksBrad's Avatar
ThanksBrad ThanksBrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Send a message via AIM to ThanksBrad
Wow the bears will take a qb. Umm what about GROSSMAN??
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:12 PM
DunnDeal's Avatar
DunnDeal DunnDeal is offline
Eru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bradley, WV
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThanksBrad
Wow the bears will take a qb. Umm what about GROSSMAN??
You think Rex Grossman is a starter in the NFL? I mean, I know the bears have had crap QB's, but I mean REALLY. I can't even think of a Florida QB who was ever any good in the NFL (please don't say spurrier ROFL)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:15 PM
keep_it_real
Guest
 
1)Cleveland fixed their QB problem with Trent Dilfler. they are not going to pass on Derrick Johnson...
2)All the GM's know the RB position is deeep this year, and no way will 2 RB go in the top 5
3)Chicago wont draft a QB, and leave Edwards/Williams on the board...

JMO...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:23 PM
ThanksBrad's Avatar
ThanksBrad ThanksBrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Send a message via AIM to ThanksBrad
Quote:
Originally Posted by DunnDeal
You think Rex Grossman is a starter in the NFL? I mean, I know the bears have had crap QB's, but I mean REALLY. I can't even think of a Florida QB who was ever any good in the NFL (please don't say spurrier ROFL)
I think Rex has been in the league for 2 years. Lets see how he performs with Mushin and if they draft edwards then he will have plenty of options. If he does not perform then your right he is not capable of starting in the NFL. I think he should have a good year.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:23 PM
shalnmunk's Avatar
shalnmunk shalnmunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by keep_it_real
1)Cleveland fixed their QB problem with Trent Dilfler. they are not going to pass on Derrick Johnson...
2)All the GM's know the RB position is deeep this year, and no way will 2 RB go in the top 5
3)Chicago wont draft a QB, and leave Edwards/Williams on the board...

JMO...
Dilfer is a Joke !! He is not a play maker... Johnson will not go that early espcially top 5 pick of the draft..... clevlands d is not that bad it was there offence that struggled and with winslow the 2 there they need a future QB athletic.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:29 PM
BucShag
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by keep_it_real
1)Cleveland fixed their QB problem with Trent Dilfler. they are not going to pass on Derrick Johnson...
2)All the GM's know the RB position is deeep this year, and no way will 2 RB go in the top 5
3)Chicago wont draft a QB, and leave Edwards/Williams on the board...

JMO...
The Browns QB problem is not fixed. They could still easily decide to get a franchise QB. They could also go for a CB. The Ravens have selected a couple of top 10 CB's while Savage was there.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:32 PM
DunnDeal's Avatar
DunnDeal DunnDeal is offline
Eru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bradley, WV
Quote:
Originally Posted by shalnmunk
Dilfer is a Joke !! He is not a play maker... Johnson will not go that early espcially top 5 pick of the draft..... clevlands d is not that bad it was there offence that struggled and with winslow the 2 there they need a future QB athletic.
Dilfer is a lot better than folks give him credit for. Give him the two dropped td passes in that superbowl and his stat line is 300+ yads 3td's 0int and he wins the SB MVP. Is he joe montana reborn? No. But he is comparable to Terry Bradshaw, just never had the benefit of 17 hof players to play with.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:37 PM
keep_it_real
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shalnmunk
Dilfer is a Joke !! He is not a play maker... Johnson will not go that early espcially top 5 pick of the draft..... clevlands d is not that bad it was there offence that struggled and with winslow the 2 there they need a future QB athletic.
They can wait till the 2nd round, and draft Jason Campbell, why missout on a LB like Derrick Johnson...6'4" 242lbs 4.5speed, a ballhawk, great student, with great charter...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:40 PM
keep_it_real
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucShag
The Browns QB problem is not fixed. They could still easily decide to get a franchise QB. They could also go for a CB. The Ravens have selected a couple of top 10 CB's while Savage was there.
The Ravens have a PB LB in Ray lewis too...Why would the Browns pass on this years Ray Lewis...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:47 PM
BucsBadBoy's Avatar
BucsBadBoy BucsBadBoy is offline
Start Clay!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Eating Waffles.
Brown and Warren. Both 1st RD bust for Cleveland. Different coaching staff and GM but would that have any affect on how they may look at a guy like Johnson this year? Would they take such a huge chance when the team has struck out in the past few years with other 1st RD defensive guys? Doesn't matter to me,just thought I would throw that out there.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-14-2005, 01:54 PM
keep_it_real
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsBadBoy
Brown and Warren. Both 1st RD bust for Cleveland. Different coaching staff and GM but would that have any affect on how they may look at a guy like Johnson this year? Would they take such a huge chance when the team has struck out in the past few years with other 1st RD defensive guys? Doesn't matter to me,just thought I would throw that out there.
True Warren/Brown were bust, but as you said this is a totally different team. I think they'll take a chance on Johnson because of the guys they have on the coaching staff. Crenell is a defensive guru, that knows how to bring the best out of players...JMO, but had Warren/Brown been with the Patroits their stories would be different, ala Seamore/Wilfork...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-14-2005, 02:00 PM
DaBears54's Avatar
DaBears54 DaBears54 is offline
Cutler to Hester... TD!
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by cammBuc
I have to disagree with you on the Chicago pick. They were dead last in passing last year because they had no wide receivers to speak of and their starting quaterback Rex Grossman was injured all year. Remember he was a 1st round draft choice 2 years ago. I do not see them using another 1st rounder on another quaterback. Just my opinion. I personally think they will go wide receiver.

exactly, Grossman is the key to the O. Before he went down, we were ranked 12th in total offense (very impressive for Chicago) and opponents actually respected the passing game enough not to stack 8 or 9 in the box (at that time, TJ was leading the NFC in rushing). Hell, DT actually led the league in recieving yards (even if it WAS only for a week). Rex energizes the entire offense with his leadership skills and pocket presence and he was getting better with every game. Chicago will take a WR, RB, or trade down.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-14-2005, 02:04 PM
cammBuc
Guest
 
I actually like Rex Grossman. I liked him at Florida and I don't agree with alot of posters on here who say just because he's from Florida he will be a bust in the NFL.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-14-2005, 02:24 PM
Psykes's Avatar
Psykes Psykes is offline
Fifth Round Steal
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Just goes to show that stats don't tell the whole story... Chicago was dead last in passing because they traded away their top receiver and (I believe) had to rely on their #3 or #4 QB..... Mind you, they're not any type of pass-heavy offence either.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-14-2005, 02:33 PM
keep_it_real
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psykes
Just goes to show that stats don't tell the whole story... Chicago was dead last in passing because they traded away their top receiver and (I believe) had to rely on their #3 or #4 QB..... Mind you, they're not any type of pass-heavy offence either.
Actually when they signed Chad Hutchinson the did a little better last season also...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-14-2005, 03:10 PM
DaBears54's Avatar
DaBears54 DaBears54 is offline
Cutler to Hester... TD!
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psykes
Just goes to show that stats don't tell the whole story... Chicago was dead last in passing because they traded away their top receiver and (I believe) had to rely on their #3 or #4 QB..... Mind you, they're not any type of pass-heavy offence either.
well said. We signed Chad and he did alright, which is why he will now be the main back-up and we are looking for a person like Brad to be the #3 and work his way up. And ur right, we traded away Booker for Ogun, but how effective would Booker have been with our carousel anyway?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-14-2005, 03:26 PM
zeke
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shalnmunk
Yes i know who he is . but they were so terrible last year its not even funny.....
You do know that Grossman was out w/ an injury most of last year, right?

Chicago needs lots of things; but they are unlikely to replace Grossman for another year or two...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-14-2005, 03:37 PM
UMiamiBucFan UMiamiBucFan is offline
Ninjas > Pirates
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
I think Rattay would be great if he had some good receivers. When their best receiver is a tight end, you know there is something wrong with their offense. Rashaun Woods could be a good player but I don't know if he'll develop into a No. 1 receiver. Braylon Edwards or Mike Williams could very easily go number 1.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-14-2005, 03:47 PM
iggle4rill
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shalnmunk
Here is how i think it will go.



1 . SAN FRANCISCO- Ronnie Brown RB Auburn

Its Clear that San Fran was 3 rd to last In Rushing last year. Compared to there balance in passing and receiving. I see them taking Brown with the First Pick. Tim is still young.

.
SF just gave Kevan Barlow a bunch of cash before last season.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-14-2005, 03:53 PM
bucsfan072
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DunnDeal
You think Rex Grossman is a starter in the NFL? I mean, I know the bears have had crap QB's, but I mean REALLY. I can't even think of a Florida QB who was ever any good in the NFL (please don't say spurrier ROFL)
Rex is not like the other FL QBs to come out. He actualy has a strong arm and is intelligent. You also have to remember that he isnt just a product of a system, he was the QB when Zook was at UF not Spurrier, one year under spurrier, yes his numbers did go down but he was still very good.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-14-2005, 09:23 PM
Bucko40's Avatar
Bucko40 Bucko40 is offline
Alstott a Buc 4ever
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dover, FL
By far the worst Mock Draft I've seen this off season. Ronnie Brown is being hyped as the next coming of Barry Sanders and he's not. In fact Brown will probably be the 3rd RB taken on draft day. His abilities don't out weigh his production at Auburn. No way does he go #1.

I doubt Cleveland will take a QB in the first. DJ or Antrel Rolle are the likely pick for the Browns. I won't even comment on the Bears selection, prue lunacy.

You obviously want the Bucs to Select BMW, so you molded your Mock to suit who you want the Bucs to take.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM.


TRUSTe Privacy Statement
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2009 Tampa Bay Buccaneers. All Rights Reserved.